jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit 2.0: LocalName grammar question.
Date Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:47:22 GMT
Antony Xerich wrote:
> I think the only problem place is "{}nodeLocalName". It may be qualified 
> name with empty ns prefix ("" , "{}nodeLocalName" ) or expanded name 
> with empty ns uri ( "", "nodeLocalName" ). It is interesting how would 
> it be translated?

I think the *intent* was to treat "{}foo" as a local name of "{}foo", 
and to consider the expanded notation of "foo" to be "foo".

I'm not sure whether this is clear from the spec; somebody should check :-)

BR, Julian

View raw message