Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Message-ID: <2049799018.1249500614931.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (JCR-2219) Improved background text extraction
In-Reply-To: <1980884801.1247756055232.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739690#action_12739690 ] 

Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-2219:
---------------------------------------

Re-applied some of the 801135 changes to make test execution more reliable.

svn revision: 801375

> Improved background text extraction
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-2219
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2219
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: indexing, jackrabbit-core
>            Reporter: Jukka Zitting
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: JCR-2219.patch
>
>
> As recently discussed on the mailing list (see http://markmail.org/message/syt7lc2guzapt7la), the current approach to text extraction in background threads doesn't work that well especially with the Tika-based extractors that support streamed parsing of many document types.
> Also, we currently *all* of the extracted text streams are buffered into Strings before being passed into the Lucene index. It would be good if we could somehow get back to passing just Readers to Lucene.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.