Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6256 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 11:38:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 11:38:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 74035 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 11:38:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 73977 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 11:38:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 73969 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 11:38:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:38:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.221] (HELO mail-bw0-f221.google.com) (209.85.218.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:38:38 +0000 Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so651059bwz.43 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:38:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CdAH+aInIyyu/ljSRcDUyAPue/c2AwpFKoMvm5woIfA=; b=Sb0JxMKqsVt+Um7sIhzla+eebtisVgRBqpTZ7H53TLUEYT0gCQXA8AkwUpF1IbsQ5t qW0nLXzdqFkJsxI8aQwreRUiLqzeOP/VOcHKtXvpx/6nLdUjI8kC30E3mfCMxsKnUTxY c5FSs2/SlyqhfMHZnyGZJlHtE8PQDj1ZTIdB0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GcuQ6cmYOS5Bzqh041E/yGcMtFkxxnUxkjz0EAAjmx8F/eSoxqJ//Glq89S92Wiguu M6JV72Q5/yYKx+iaXMO4fe6wjXF1Vtz9tWKEjr+T4N+Fp5ZK+Ms1B0vxowkb7cyjEzeQ vvl3nRkPM8WF748EL2EzMMh5v9vcZli4YNSUA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.71.134 with SMTP id h6mr1832950bkj.70.1247225897920; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:38:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8f70390907100319h5c2214f5g608a2bbcc5976c27@mail.gmail.com> References: <8f70390907100319h5c2214f5g608a2bbcc5976c27@mail.gmail.com> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:37:57 +0200 Message-ID: <510143ac0907100437h4f69970es66f153b914ba91d6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Is JCR-1972 going to be included? To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Paco Avila wrote: > I wonder if the patch JCR-1972 is going to be included in a near release, > because I have to update it to match a recent jackrabbit-core version. I like the idea so I think it would be good to have it included, perhaps already in 1.6.0. Can you check that the patch is fine with the 1.x branch? There may be some minor adjustments that we need to do before applying the patch though, I'll comment more in the issue. BR, Jukka Zitting