Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4A549377.5000505@anyware-tech.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:39:19 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Launay?=
 <sebastien.launay@anyware-tech.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 1.6 release plan
References: <510143ac0904210810g33b92532i7aa36797de1bfa6@mail.gmail.com>
 	<510143ac0905250237n61d84ac4oc6e909d62bd5bf56@mail.gmail.com>
 	<510143ac0906180715p4574b1f6i5e2a59f4160de7c6@mail.gmail.com>
 	<7A5837CEF4D4834E97721F3BCC46D7F71BEC4DEB3A@darth-malak.gx.local>
 <510143ac0907080237w7877685bndb344c9a5026ea19@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <510143ac0907080237w7877685bndb344c9a5026ea19@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Jukka,

I created an issue about a deadlock a few weeks ago.
I was unable to create a Jackrabbit test case but my business test
case always reproduces the deadlock. But, i posted the java stack
trace [1]  in order to help finding the race condition.

I know this issue is not fixed yet, but i thought there is better
chances to see it merged into 1.6 branch if it implies important
changes than into 1.5 branch.

I try again to create a test case but i do not have enough
understanding of Jackrabbit lock management, especially in
SharedItemStateManager component.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2171

Jukka Zitting a �crit :
> Yes, I merged them all to the 1.x branch yesterday.
>
> I'm now planning to move forward with the 1.6.0 release, even if the
> backup/migration feature isn't fully complete yet. We can add the
> missing pieces later in the 1.6.x cycle.
>
> Let me know if there's anything missing from the 1.x branch that you'd
> like included in the 1.6.0 release.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>   
--
S�bastien Launay