jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "angela (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Resolved: (JCR-2156) Usage of "qualified name" in JavaDoc and Comments
Date Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:41:07 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

angela resolved JCR-2156.

    Resolution: Fixed
      Assignee: angela

> Usage of "qualified name" in JavaDoc and Comments
> -------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-2156
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2156
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jackrabbit-core, jackrabbit-jcr2spi
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: angela
> Within jackrabbit the term "qualified name" is used, when the internal representation
of a JCR name is referred according to the usage of "fully-qualified name" within the JSR
170 specification.
> Based on input by julian (Issue #449) the phrasing has been adjusted in JSR 283 to match
the terminology used in XMLNS.
> As of JSR 283
> - Qualified Name -> refers to a JCR Name in the form prefix:localname
> - Expanded Name -> is used for what was formerly called "fully-qualified name".
> In order to avoid confusion i would suggest to fix the javadoc throughout the project
and eventually add explanations in cases where method or class names are misleading.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message