jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "angela (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (JCR-2156) Usage of "qualified name" in JavaDoc and Comments
Date Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:43:07 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

angela updated JCR-2156:
------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 2.0.0

> Usage of "qualified name" in JavaDoc and Comments
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-2156
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2156
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jackrabbit-core, jackrabbit-jcr2spi, jackrabbit-spi, jackrabbit-spi-commons,
jackrabbit-webdav
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: angela
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Within jackrabbit the term "qualified name" is used, when the internal representation
of a JCR name is referred according to the usage of "fully-qualified name" within the JSR
170 specification.
> Based on input by julian (Issue #449) the phrasing has been adjusted in JSR 283 to match
the terminology used in XMLNS.
> As of JSR 283
> - Qualified Name -> refers to a JCR Name in the form prefix:localname
> - Expanded Name -> is used for what was formerly called "fully-qualified name".
> In order to avoid confusion i would suggest to fix the javadoc throughout the project
and eventually add explanations in cases where method or class names are misleading.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message