jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "angela (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-2144) InternalValue refactoring
Date Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:15:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718495#action_12718495

angela commented on JCR-2144:

Obvious simplifications would include:

- InternalValue.getLength instead of InternValue.getBLOBFileValue().getLength()
- InternalValue.discard() instead of InternalValue.getBLOBFileValue().discard()

Furthermore i got the impression that in most cases instances of InternalValue could be reduced
to the interface.

The most frequent reason why the functionality exposed by the interface isn't sufficient is
InternalValue.getUUID() used to build a new NodeId (reference tracking, accessing nodes by
uuid etc...). 
This is related to the discussion in JCR-1232.

> InternalValue refactoring
> -------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-2144
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2144
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
> Now that we have use the value factory from spi-commons, the InternalValue code should
be simplified.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message