jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Diephouse <dan.diepho...@mulesource.com>
Subject Re: Generics generator class
Date Thu, 07 May 2009 10:39:20 GMT
Yeah, come on guys. Does this even *remotely* compare to hitting a disk or a
JDBC connection?
My preference would be to just use the regular java syntax. Having static
methods can be handy for some of the casting type situations instead of
calling something like someClass.cast(foo), but otherwise it just gets in
the way.

Keep in mind that when you type "new ArrayList<String>()" in any decent IDE
it'll finish the other side for you. Or if you type "List<String> myList = "
it'll again present the other side to you. Having to do New.arrayList() just
makes it more difficult.

That and I think New.foo() is less readable since it breaks the standard
java syntax. It just looks weird.


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> IMHO, performance is completely irrelevant to this question.
> BR,
> Jukka Zitting

Dan Diephouse
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

View raw message