Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82342 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2009 20:05:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2009 20:05:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 59471 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2009 20:05:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 59390 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2009 20:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 59382 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2009 20:05:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:05:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paolo.moz@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.167 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.167] (HELO mail-fx0-f167.google.com) (209.85.220.167) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:05:23 +0000 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so608214fxm.43 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:05:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OyYKBuCMkEXcnpKJw85qlQMSac8/Aly2Hb0JMIOII7g=; b=fvW3u4mBCztC0LBOf0m1fi9teTNS9MYZTIG0fhGcbCNjdsVT2AEhBkS2obruUwwjn2 BI6zgdUmbWiNHkZFGltddBJqkIunsqRsXq+a3oDyypgs0XUnY8lThmcknkBUtDGb8kZ9 dEQCjrLWyOcjniPEWxvaiwarOQKlrKI2RQcDI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xvJ30hFzCmKU+8hK5fRtngcSKwXh+q0ZckadbdZfYizydrcG8w0AYRaTdX4Kr4Db0y Lq9lOI4Gtpvr09rDBnbVzfm/xi07BItRK6qka60YYQIy2yNNawT3MTNy6GWzODRtFc4m ic29o9L+sEZeAZpjfL1ac5jM54kVncD6ZexXI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.213.10 with SMTP id p10mr945873muq.17.1239912301865; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:05:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49E789C9.3070704@nuxeo.com> References: <49E3BAC8.9070109@springsource.com> <49E43082.70602@gmail.com> <49E5384F.7070306@apachecon.com> <49E789C9.3070704@nuxeo.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:05:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Chemistry (PMC Invitation to Participate in ApacheCon 2009/US) From: Paolo Mottadelli To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Florent, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote: > FWIW I have submitted a talk proposal about Chemistry for ApacheCon US 2009 > a few months ago. I have no idea if it's going to be accepted by the program > committee, but if yes then that would be already a visible presence at > ApacheCon. As per my understanding of the Planners' invitation, having already submitted your proposal about Chemistry is the ideal starting point. Now PMCs should come up with valuable proposals and give guidance to Planners about conference contents. After PMCs submitting their 'big picture' programs, talks will be elected among the ones already submitted. That is to say: Planners are going to drive a double phase selection; phase 2_ coming on top of 1_: 1_ PMCs programs selection 2_ Talks selection If the previous considerations stand, we should firstly come up with an interesting program (including 1 or more projects); this will increase chances of success for submitted talks surfing around such a program. Is my understanding about this correct? Cheers, -- Paolo Mottadelli: http://www.paolomottadelli.com Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com