jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Incubating Chemistry
Date Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:51:11 GMT

Jukka Zitting schrieb:
> Hi,
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Florent Guillaume <fg@nuxeo.com> wrote:
>> Note that I'll need Metro bindings for WS as well, as we want to test
>> interop with both CXF and Metro. But the core code should be generic in any
>> case.
> OK, cool. Metro looks like it could be a bit troublesome from a
> licensing perspective (didn't look too closely), but it should be fine
> as long as it's just an optional or test dependency.
>> Also I had envisionned the Jackrabbit-specific backend living in the
>> Jackrabbit project, to simplify inter-projects dependency management (as
>> Chemistry is an infrastructure project).
> Sure, makes perfect sense. The way I see it, Chemistry would contain a
> generic CMIS-to-JCR bridge and Jackrabbit would use that bridge to
> CMIS-enable the repository. I updated the proposal accordingly.

That the Jackrabbit "backend" resides in Jackrabbit makes perfect sense
to me. How about Chemistry starting off with a first implementation of
that backend, which could then be migrated to the Jackrabbit project
once the interfaces and implementation have stabilized a bit ?


View raw message