Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99707 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2009 09:29:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2009 09:29:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 13179 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2009 09:29:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 12799 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2009 09:29:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 12790 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2009 09:29:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:29:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.17 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.17] (HELO mail-fx0-f17.google.com) (209.85.220.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:29:48 +0000 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so480928fxm.19 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:29:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yxWG2Ah5o5f6il7OIIBHIluG7pr9LyT+E7yw+Dm4EaY=; b=Z7BydOPW6zZffC1MZLbQaVr2H1VLLxbvRlPba90ZuzBwPvgTcy+rrJ8VEK4mYFujzj GmIO0lE4NvAqdJsnKOwXAfvBCAajSvn07RNE9HZ7Z6gKiaALZziSq7U4fC6xgeecoXJQ T71gi9l3O2bXg1jphE/zv8MOxkXZ/mqpGG1Hk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kRxhv79GqIL9FmWsZZXOQtVycuaLuNFmGf15sRW04F55jf0yu35O5if2Eg3dgIQgCC o92VFDNh22t5qLWlawxMpOraqbdhWOodL5kZcf2KkINYLRsGiaU9JKzLgxhEDzYHEjbE 8rSCBNhM/MEQjt5nOeqfc6dK4Vt7a0N+8gEQk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.199.16 with SMTP id b16mr1002588bkq.142.1233739767957; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:29:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4988E98B.7060203@wyona.com> References: <49870DA1.5040100@wyona.com> <4988E98B.7060203@wyona.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:29:27 +0100 Message-ID: <510143ac0902040129g778985a1l1459f5885cd202f3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: CRX 1.4.1 released - powered by Apache Jackrabbit & Sling - thanks! From: Jukka Zitting To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Michael Wechner wrote: > One more difference I see is that your post didn't seem to provoke many > reactions (yet) > > http://www.nabble.com/CRX-1.4.1-released---powered-by-Apache-Jackrabbit---Sling---thanks!-td21791030.html > > whereas mine did quite a bit > > http://www.nabble.com/devs-for-fire-td17646225.html#a17655501 My comment on that thread was: "I don't see anything wrong with job offers as long as they are related to JCR and Jackrabbit and not too frequent. Especially when the company behind the offer participates in the community (i.e. I don't want to see nameless head hunters roaming around here)." My thinking on related product announcements is similar, so IMHO Greg's message was fine. We probably should follow up on the earlier idea of posting some guidelines for these kinds of messages to build a better shared understanding of what's appropriate and what's not. BR, Jukka Zitting