Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15780 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2009 07:07:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2009 07:07:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 50026 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2009 07:07:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 49998 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2009 07:07:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 49989 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2009 07:07:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:07:53 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jhuebel@opentext.com designates 149.235.128.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [149.235.128.48] (HELO mucmx01.ixos.de) (149.235.128.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:07:45 +0000 Received: from mucpm02.smtp.dmz.opentext.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mucmx01.ixos.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n1977MQ8009225 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:07:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from MUCXGC2.opentext.net (mucxg01.opentext.net [149.235.128.135]) by mucpm02.smtp.dmz.opentext.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1977M4A021662 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 02:07:22 -0500 (envelope-from jhuebel@opentext.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Working on CMIS Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:07:20 +0100 Message-ID: <267F7EC9C11CCB4C806D30029DA677630BFBE1D2@MUCXGC2.opentext.net> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Working on CMIS thread-index: AcmIvwqnzUO6tAyRRmKL5L1P6IKsyABxVU/A References: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_H=FCbel?= To: X-Archived: msg.BBGSndK:2009-02-09:mucpm02.smtp.dmz.opentext.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Florent, this looks like an interesting project! It would be nice if you could at = some point in time give some more details about your proposed = architecture. Is this following the guideline David presented at the = CMIS TC meeting? Meaning is there a common abstraction layer hiding the = protocol specific bindings? Will this be only server or server and = client? Jens -----Original Message----- From: Florent Guillaume [mailto:fg@nuxeo.com]=20 Sent: Samstag, 7. Februar 2009 01:57 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Working on CMIS Hi all, I'm from Nuxeo, and we plan on working a lot on CMIS in the coming =20 months. We're very interested in the young but promising ideas embodied in the =20 current jcr-cmis sandbox, because we plan on offering CMIS bindings on =20 top of our current repository (Nuxeo 5.2). We'll be using and =20 contributing to the API+client parts of the jcr-cmis project very =20 soon, and I wanted to announce this to you first. Nuxeo has been using Jackrabbit as one of its underlying content =20 storage for quite some time, and we're quite familiar with it. However =20 for the time being our area of focus will not be the CMIS-to-JCR =20 (server) part, but the building of a complete Java API and model for =20 CMIS, and the bindings of AtomPub and SOAP to it. Internally we'll be =20 writing a binding from the Java API to our Nuxeo Core API. I'm not yet an Apache committer so our contributions will take the =20 form of patches for the time being. I'll be floating ideas soon about code and stuff :) Thanks, Florent --=20 Florent Guillaume, Head of R&D, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87