Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <20422008.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:25:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Fard <maurice.fard@gmail.com>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Alternative OCM (Object Content Mapping )
In-Reply-To: <200811101035.06345.lukin@stu.cn.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20414731.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <200811101035.06345.lukin@stu.cn.ua>


Before I use JCROM I tried using native Jackrabbit OCM but it didn't response
to my need.
Anyhow thank you for your recommend.


Aleksei Lukin wrote:
> 
> On Monday 10 November 2008 08:03:35 Fard wrote:
> 
> I successfully  use native Jackrabbit OCM and it is more powerfull then
> JCROM though a bit complicated. First take a look at 
> 
>  http://jackrabbit.apache.org/object-content-mapping.html
> 
> But the best way to get into is test suite from jackrabbit-ocm source. I'd
> like to recomend to download 1.5 branch of jackrabbit from SVN and use all
> the stuff from there.
> Jackrabbit 1.5 is in beta 2 stage and while you develop it will get stable
> release.
>  
> 
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I am looking for an alternative OCM (Object Content Mapping). I have used
>> JCROM and I found it is useful, but recently I found it is not a good
>> remedy for java generic programming.
>>
>> I really really appreciate any help.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fard
> 
> -- 
> SY, Alex Lukin
> RIPE NIC HDL: LEXA1-RIPE
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Alternative-OCM-%28Object-Content-Mapping-%29-tp20414731p20422008.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.