jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thomas Mueller (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (JCR-1836) Persistence: support property databaseType
Date Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:01:48 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Thomas Mueller updated JCR-1836:

    Attachment: databaseType.patch

Deprecate (but still support) the setting 'schema' 
and use 'databaseType' instead in
DatabaseJournal and BundleDbPersistenceManager.

> Persistence: support property databaseType
> ------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-1836
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1836
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>            Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: databaseType.patch
> In persistence managers and cluster journal the term 'schema' is used to mean 'database
> Using the term 'schema' for that is actually quite confusing (in my view):
> The definition of schema http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_schema is "the schema
defines the tables, the fields in each table, and the relationships between fields and tables."
> Additionally in most databases a schema is is a name space within a database: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/sql/DatabaseMetaData.html#getSchemas()
> I suggest to support the property 'databaseType' in addition to 'schema' for the persistence
managers and the cluster journal.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message