Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of 1111software@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.235 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=FN64un6ngpsMq6sm3iW8X8oQFlI7a8PpHgiLiWKx7E79pP9SGP4RI00IL1Wtuam89M
         gy1H9j+ST4w/5/kkOgOlexhJO5BSpjU1zdSGYz4PiXyCJW0V4pMosZzmz/RtXEC3d8JN
         173BtESwi8l4w7f2ASCxaih7Sn4EneZroZyy4=
Message-ID: <fd7bdf180810090116i79704462od2d0cc24cfea7e8a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:16:21 +0200
From: "Jacco van Weert" <1111software@gmail.com>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: AccessManager- checkPermissions method
In-Reply-To: <19880715.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_107169_6619645.1223540181332"
References: <19880715.post@talk.nabble.com>

------=_Part_107169_6619645.1223540181332
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hello,

I have also created an own AccessManager implementation (
http://jecars.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jecars/jecars_main/src/org/jecars/CARS_AccessManager.java?revision=1.18&view=markup
)

I didn't implemented the checkPermission() method and until now I see no
difference in the wanted behaviour.
I think the isGranted() method is the main method.


Greetings,

   Jacco


On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:05 PM, pkrishna <prabhakar.krishnaswami@ge.com>wrote:

>
> I am exploring the possibility of providing node-level authorization for
> READ, WRITE, REMOVE and ADD actions. Based on the many postings, I was able
> to gather that I have to extend SimpleAccessManager and override
> checkPermissions method that implements our domain-specific code. I
> examined
> SimpleAccessManager and other samples I was able to get at from the forum.
> I
> couldn't see the parameter ItemId being used anywhere.
>
> Do we have any examples how ItemId is used within the checkPermission
> method?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/AccessManager--checkPermissions-method-tp19880715p19880715.html
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
-------------------------------------
Jacco van Weert -- 1111software@gmail.com
JCR Controller -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~weertj/jcr
JeCARS -- http://jecars.sourceforge.net

------=_Part_107169_6619645.1223540181332--