jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jacco van Weert" <1111softw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: AccessManager- checkPermissions method
Date Thu, 09 Oct 2008 08:16:21 GMT

I have also created an own AccessManager implementation (

I didn't implemented the checkPermission() method and until now I see no
difference in the wanted behaviour.
I think the isGranted() method is the main method.



On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:05 PM, pkrishna <prabhakar.krishnaswami@ge.com>wrote:

> I am exploring the possibility of providing node-level authorization for
> READ, WRITE, REMOVE and ADD actions. Based on the many postings, I was able
> to gather that I have to extend SimpleAccessManager and override
> checkPermissions method that implements our domain-specific code. I
> examined
> SimpleAccessManager and other samples I was able to get at from the forum.
> I
> couldn't see the parameter ItemId being used anywhere.
> Do we have any examples how ItemId is used within the checkPermission
> method?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/AccessManager--checkPermissions-method-tp19880715p19880715.html
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jacco van Weert -- 1111software@gmail.com
JCR Controller -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~weertj/jcr
JeCARS -- http://jecars.sourceforge.net

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message