Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20612 invoked from network); 20 May 2008 05:24:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 May 2008 05:24:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 25132 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2008 05:24:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 25099 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2008 05:24:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 25088 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2008 05:24:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 May 2008 22:24:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.8.61.8] (HELO spamslammer2.tirol.gv.at) (194.8.61.8) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2008 05:23:25 +0000 Received: from mailscan1.tirol.local (unknown [10.10.128.204]) by spamslammer2.tirol.gv.at (Spamslammer) with ESMTP id A4ED120002073D5F for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 07:23:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mxs0.tirol.local (unverified) by mailscan1.tirol.local (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.2.9) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 07:23:47 +0200 Received: from mxs01.tirol.local ([10.10.128.211]) by mxs0.tirol.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 20 May 2008 07:23:46 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable x-cr-puzzleid: {CD3987CB-121A-4628-8FB5-81C3C1644A40} Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: AW: DataStore Garbage Collector Performance Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 07:23:39 +0200 Message-ID: x-cr-hashedpuzzle: ASQV C/1V DlVA DsnG EFoq EXdo EkUj GQOf Gf5l HVzj Hwl7 IjSC JsuN KZ1u MCgY MOip;1;ZABlAHYAQABqAGEAYwBrAHIAYQBiAGIAaQB0AC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{CD3987CB-121A-4628-8FB5-81C3C1644A40};YwAuAGsAbwBlAGwAbABAAHQAaQByAG8AbAAuAGcAdgAuAGEAdAA=;Tue, 20 May 2008 05:23:39 GMT;QQBXADoAIABEAGEAdABhAFMAdABvAHIAZQAgAEcAYQByAGIAYQBnAGUAIABDAG8AbABsAGUAYwB0AG8AcgAgAFAAZQByAGYAbwByAG0AYQBuAGMAZQA= In-Reply-To: <91f3b2650805190612t54747880oafa8d920163190e@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: DataStore Garbage Collector Performance Thread-Index: Aci5shGwex4aceQhTfCvyiNi4IWIWwAhyoyg References: <91f3b2650805190612t54747880oafa8d920163190e@mail.gmail.com> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=D6LL_Claus?= To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 May 2008 05:23:46.0982 (UTC) FILETIME=[ADADF460:01C8BA39] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi thomas, i have testet it with the option set to true and it takes about 3,2 hours ... what do you think how long will it take to improve the gc process much = more ? thanks claus -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: tmueller@day.com [mailto:tmueller@day.com] Im Auftrag von Thomas = M=FCller Gesendet: Montag, 19. Mai 2008 15:12 An: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Betreff: Re: DataStore Garbage Collector Performance Hi, Did you use the 'persistence manager scan' option? GarbageCollector.setPersistenceManagerScan(true); That should improve the performance. I have added a idea how to speed up garbage collection in the future at http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/DataStore (at the very bottom). Regards, Thomas