Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5508 invoked from network); 13 May 2008 09:41:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2008 09:41:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 84056 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2008 09:41:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 84027 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2008 09:41:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 84016 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2008 09:41:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 May 2008 02:41:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 May 2008 09:40:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E71234C114 for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 02:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <556317378.1210671657227.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 02:40:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (JCR-1555) Add support for boolean values to QValue In-Reply-To: <1132028508.1209135957635.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1555?page=3Dcom.atlassian.= jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated JCR-1555: ---------------------------------- Attachment: JCR-1555-mreutegg.patch I'm +1 on adding the methods for boolean properties, but would rather not c= reate a new QValueImpl instance on each call. See attached patch. > Add support for boolean values to QValue > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: JCR-1555 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1555 > Project: Jackrabbit > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jackrabbit-spi, jackrabbit-spi-commons > Reporter: Michael D=C3=BCrig > Priority: Minor > Attachments: JCR-1555(2).patch, JCR-1555-mreutegg.patch, JCR-1555= .patch > > > I suggest to add support for reading and writing boolean values to QValue= and QValueFactory. I find it strange that there is such support for the ot= her data types but booleans must be constructed via strings.=20 --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.