jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: Same name siblings
Date Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:09:11 GMT
David Nuescheler wrote:
>>> On the other hand I would really like to give people a means to
>>> work with large anonymous unordered collections.
>>> I think a feature that would address the "I have a bag of objects
>>> and I just want to persist them without thinking of a 'name' for
>>> each" usecase, would definitely be great. Maybe this could
>>> be the introduction of an addNode() without a childnode name.
>> A big +1 on that idea.
>> "Store this and return me a path" would be really useful. Would it make
>> sense to allow the impl to choose the container as well?
> interesting twist, would that be a Session.addNode() vs. a Node.addNode()
> without a node name?

Yes, it would allow the server to choose a location based on the node type.

I guess it would be confusing on Node :-).

BR, Julian

View raw message