jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-1412) [Patch] Pure Java-based configuration of Jackrabbit (no repository.xml needed)
Date Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:28:51 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572182#action_12572182
] 

Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-1412:
------------------------------------

Instead of adding builder classes I'd rather just modify the Config classes directly.

Also, I'm a bit reluctant to add such a large volume of stuff in a maintenance branch. Is
this required for JCR-1400 or could you live without it? Couldn't you just create custom repository.xml
files for each test case that needs custom configuration?


> [Patch] Pure Java-based configuration of Jackrabbit (no repository.xml needed)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1412
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1412
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: config, jackrabbit-core, test
>            Reporter: Alexander Klimetschek
>             Fix For: 1.3.4
>
>         Attachments: jackrabbit-core.dynamic-config-for-testing.patch
>
>
> Jackrabbit should be dynamically configurable, ie. without the need for a repository.xml
but through pure Java code.
> This is helpful for unit tests, where you want to automatically test different configurations
(eg. PersistenceManagers) without creating hundreds of repository.xml files that differ only
in certain parts.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message