jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Nuescheler" <da...@day.com>
Subject Re: Same name siblings
Date Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:03:54 GMT
> > On the other hand I would really like to give people a means to
> > work with large anonymous unordered collections.
> > I think a feature that would address the "I have a bag of objects
> > and I just want to persist them without thinking of a 'name' for
> > each" usecase, would definitely be great. Maybe this could
> > be the introduction of an addNode() without a childnode name.
> A big +1 on that idea.
> "Store this and return me a path" would be really useful. Would it make
> sense to allow the impl to choose the container as well?
interesting twist, would that be a Session.addNode() vs. a Node.addNode()
without a node name?


View raw message