Hi,
[taking this thread from users@ to dev@]
On Nov 27, 2007 4:35 PM, Ard Schrijvers <a.schrijvers@hippo.nl> wrote:
> I am ATM not sure wether I can translate DASL into SQL (or at least
> 95%)(XPATH). I think they don't totally match.
Julian probably knows all the details...
> Writing basic-search isn't to hard if I could translate it directly into
> lucene queries, but...this of course it not a very nice thing todo, because
> jackrabbit has this query grammar sets, but I really do not know how
> they work (not sure if i want to learn about javacc) :-)
How about exposing a "Lucene" query language at the Jackrabbit
QueryManager level? This way a Jackrabbit-specific client could bypass
the XPath or SQL parsing and issue queries directly against the
underlying Lucene index.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
|