jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (JCR-1145) ObjectConverterImpl.getObject(Session, Class, String) may not resolve mapping correctly for incompletely described mappings
Date Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:31:43 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Jukka Zitting updated JCR-1145:
-------------------------------

          Component/s: jcr-mapping
    Affects Version/s:     (was: 1.4)

> ObjectConverterImpl.getObject(Session, Class, String) may not resolve mapping correctly
for incompletely described mappings
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1145
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1145
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jcr-mapping
>            Reporter: Felix Meschberger
>            Assignee: Felix Meschberger
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> When a node is mapped by calling the ObjectConverter.getObject(Session, Class, String)
method and no discriminator property is configured the ObjectConverterImpl class tries to
find a "best" mapping for the effective node. This is done by walking the class descriptor
hierarchy starting at the descriptor for the selected class until a mapping for the node type
is found.
> In case the class descriptor hierarchy is incomplete because an improperly defined class
descriptor would actually perfectly map the node but is not declared to extend (or implement)
its parent classes/interfaces, the hierarchy walk down will not find the mapping and thus
in the end, the originally requested class will be instantiated. If the class is abstract
or an interface this of course fails.
> If an exact class descriptor for the node type would be looked up directly, the mapping
might be found immediately and the class of the descriptor can be verified it actually is
assignement compatible with the requested class. If this would fail, we could still walk the
hierarchy to see, whether we find another classdescriptor.
> To clarify the issue consider the following example of an abstract base class and a concrete
extension class with their node types
>    AbstractBaseClass maps abstractly to AbstractBaseType
>    BaseClass (extends AbstractBaseClass) maps to BaseType ( with supertype AbstractBaseType
)
> Note, that the BaseClass mapping does not declare to extend the AbstractBaseClass.
> When calling ObjectConverterImpl.getObject(session, AbstractBaseClass.class, aBaseTypeNode),
the descriptor fore the AbstractBaseClass is inspected agains the node and then it is decided
to check the class descriptor hierarchy. Node mapping can be found by walking the hierarchy
and hence the AbstractBaseClass is instantiated, which of course fails.
> If the BaseClass mapping would be declared as extending the AbstractBaseClass mapping,
everything would be fine.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message