jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Esteban Franqueiro" <esteban.franque...@bea.com>
Subject Re: Fw: Realtime datastore garbage collector
Date Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:59:39 GMT
> Yes, GC must be implemented. What I wanted to say was: I think it is
> better at this stage if the implementation is defensive.

I agree, but the fact that it is possible to loose all the new binary content is not defensive.

>> Regarding the scenario I presented, what I would like to know is if we consider it
an acceptable
>> risk or not. I'm still not sure about this issue.
> I think it is too risky to remove the transient identifier when the
> item is stored in the persistence manager.

Why is that?
Maybe we can come up with a better way to prevent accidental deletions in the GC.


Esteban Franqueiro

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information  of  BEA
Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,
 copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.

View raw message