Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90571 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2007 07:27:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Oct 2007 07:27:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 91859 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2007 07:27:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 91821 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2007 07:27:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 91812 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2007 07:27:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:27:29 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:27:41 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9797971422E for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8514184.1193297210617.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Felix Meschberger (JIRA)" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (JCR-1187) Asking a property twice for it's stream returns the same stream instance In-Reply-To: <2455649.1193240510593.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537527 ] Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-1187: ---------------------------------------- You are right, but there is a very small point to this: To get a new stream, you have to reaquire the value through Property.getValue(), which is exactly how Property.getStream() is defined. Thus, as a consequence, Property.getStream() MUST always return a new stream. > Asking a property twice for it's stream returns the same stream instance > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: JCR-1187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1187 > Project: Jackrabbit > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jackrabbit-core > Reporter: Esteban Franqueiro > Attachments: DataStoreTestUtils.java, TestTwoGetStreams.java > > > If you ask a property stored in the database data store (JCR-1154) for it's associated stream twice, the stream instance returned is the same. This behavior is not consistent with the file data store, which returns a different stream instance each time Property.getStream() is called. > I'm attaching a test case wich demostrates the issue. > We're working on this and have a potencial fix for it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.