Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Message-ID: <4054069.1193065370839.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (JCR-1152) SPI implementations currently need to
 provide implementations of both ValueFactory and QValueFactory
In-Reply-To: <423795.1190990930831.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536697 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-1152:
-------------------------------------

I don't think so.

Obviously, as a JCR implementation, JCR2SPI needs to provide a ValueFactory to the JCR client.

However, right now, an SPI implementation needs to provide implementations of both jcr.ValueFactory and spi.QValueFactory. Optimally, only the latter would be needed, and JCR2SPI would provide a ValueFactory implementation wrapping just the spi:QValueFactory.

Now clearer?


> SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and QValueFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1152
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This should be simplified so that an implementation of QValueFactory is sufficient.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.