From dev-return-14707-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Sat Oct 20 15:53:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58420 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2007 15:53:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2007 15:53:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 83090 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2007 15:53:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 83061 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2007 15:53:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 83052 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2007 15:53:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:53:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.10.46.63] (HELO as.toolazydogs.com) (72.10.46.63) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:53:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 3813 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2007 08:53:14 -0700 Received: from c-67-169-131-11.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (HELO ?192.168.1.201?) (67.169.131.11) by toolazydogs.com with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 20 Oct 2007 08:53:14 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <5f211bd50710192333k869ae3dg3bb3fd5d9db6e0cb@mail.gmail.com> References: <2D8DF6E3-972A-42A5-99B2-5E4EFCAFB37E@toolazydogs.com> <5f211bd50709170733u1c8e4d67l1484671b69b2460a@mail.gmail.com> <60FDAFA4-7FFA-4292-A2CE-999DD0AEFA09@toolazydogs.com> <5f211bd50709200034r8e706dbu7f9c405a2659322b@mail.gmail.com> <4664B385-0A01-4189-94A9-A1355D21425B@toolazydogs.com> <510143ac0709220332k2622bb64x8a413a88aedf0ec2@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0710021641t1119a54bmbf09586587d3c89@mail.gmail.com> <946C109B-0EA8-4A00-B0FB-C7729B6AD8FC@toolazydogs.com> <5f211bd50710192333k869ae3dg3bb3fd5d9db6e0cb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <19E9ECB1-31ED-42A5-ACB9-0AEBB1280FDD@toolazydogs.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Alan D. Cabrera" Subject: Re: System slowdown Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:53:10 -0700 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 19, 2007, at 11:33 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Hi, > >>>> Are file based blob stores inherently non-transactional or does one >>>> just need to be written? >>> Just needs to be written. >> I need one and am happy to try to write one. Do you have any >> pointers before I embark on this endeavor? > > Sorry, I don't have any pointers, but instead of improving blob store, > I think you should have a look at the data store. Other than with the > blob store, transactions are not a problem in the data store. The plan > is to enable it for Jackrabbit 1.4. So are you saying that if I start using that new fangled data store a non-transactional blob store will be moot? Regards, Alan