jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-1152) SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and QValueFactory
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:02:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536697
] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-1152:
-------------------------------------

I don't think so.

Obviously, as a JCR implementation, JCR2SPI needs to provide a ValueFactory to the JCR client.

However, right now, an SPI implementation needs to provide implementations of both jcr.ValueFactory
and spi.QValueFactory. Optimally, only the latter would be needed, and JCR2SPI would provide
a ValueFactory implementation wrapping just the spi:QValueFactory.

Now clearer?


> SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and
QValueFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1152
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This should be simplified so that an implementation of QValueFactory is sufficient.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message