jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-1152) SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and QValueFactory
Date Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:32:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537862
] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-1152:
-------------------------------------

> - QValue (or its factory) is in charge of defining the required format of a Reference
values
>   i.e. this is delegated to the SPI implementation.

Correct.

> consequently we can probably get rid if the second valuefactory i moved to jcr-commons,
> can't we?

We won't need the ValueFactory and the ValueImpls anymore. Maybe we can also get rid of some
utility classes for conversion.

> - I would be possible to have SPI implementation that uses a separate data store for
>  binaries and have the entries created immediately upon creation of a JCR Value. at
>  least theoretically... 

Correct.


> SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and
QValueFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1152
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This should be simplified so that an implementation of QValueFactory is sufficient.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message