jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-1152) SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and QValueFactory
Date Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:05:51 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537659
] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-1152:
-------------------------------------

Plan:

- remove getValueFactory() from RepositoryConfig

- let JCR2SPI implement it's own ValueFactory, wrapping the QValueFactory implemented  by
the SPI impl

- use Value instances that wrap QValues

- push most functionality down from Value to QValue

NOTE: this means that QValue implementations now have to deal with value conversions, while
before this was done by the ValueFactory that was used.


> SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and
QValueFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1152
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This should be simplified so that an implementation of QValueFactory is sufficient.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message