jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-1152) SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and QValueFactory
Date Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:35:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538544
] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-1152:
-------------------------------------

Next step: the plan is to update jcr-spi-commons with:

- an implementation of Value (JCR) that just wraps a QValue (SPI) instance, and

- an implementation of ValueFactory (JCR) that just wraps QValueFactory (SPI) and NamePathResolver
(SPI commons) instances.

Note that this means that all the logic for converting between property types, and comparing
values will be pushed down into the QValue instance. The Value implementation will only be
responsible for the JCR-specific stream handling.



> SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and
QValueFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1152
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This should be simplified so that an implementation of QValueFactory is sufficient.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message