jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "angela (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-1152) SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and QValueFactory
Date Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:25:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537861
] 

angela commented on JCR-1152:
-----------------------------

from my understanding this would also mean

- QValue (or its factory) is in charge of defining the required format of a Reference values
   i.e. this is delegated to the SPI implementation.

consequently we can probably get rid if the second valuefactory i moved to jcr-commons,
can't we?

- I would be possible to have SPI implementation that uses a separate data store for
  binaries and have the entries created immediately upon creation of a JCR Value. at
  least theoretically... 
  

> SPI implementations currently need to provide implementations of both ValueFactory and
QValueFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1152
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1152
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This should be simplified so that an implementation of QValueFactory is sufficient.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message