Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <12679727.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Andrea K." <akregar@alteanet.it>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (JCR-905) Clustering: race condition may
 cause duplicate entries in search index
In-Reply-To: <46E11CE7.6080906@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <9745772.1178703795457.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
 <2574687.1184145064725.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <12521069.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <46E11CE7.6080906@gmx.net>


Hi Marcel,
I'm just trying your proposed patch on a cluster.

If you want I can send you the resulting JR debug log and personal
impressions.

Thanks.
Andrea -


Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> 
> Andrea K. wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> i'm testing the "2 line patch" as suggested in
>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel).
>> 
>> As I can see, no duplicated nodes exists with cluster configuration.
>> 
>> What do you think aboout the patch proposed? Should it be used without
>> any
>> problem (other than a slow indexing tasks)?
> 
> the patch will probably work, but is not a good solution to the problem.
> it adds 
> overhead even if jackrabbit is not clustered.
> 
> 
> regards
>   marcel
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28JCR-905%29-Clustering%3A-race-condition-may-cause-duplicate-entries-in-search-index-tf3714767.html#a12679727
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.