Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fmeschbe@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.185 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ozs4FYoHGpKzJI6q9lhrCFbpgdvVzngT6pgSkPin9UoJydpZRDwuJwAj2pIdZIKsB/reYkfrwHvR+yVUJQfBndI927p9+M7feFufOZX9k0nijBg6osX3opFHQZbyfGGJsb6M+HV8wSEne8oSxNKp27drghbtUA1+oAIATa8zdMs=
Subject: Re: release for Jackrabbit 1.4
From: Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@gmail.com>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <46F1FD03.8090806@sun.com>
References: <46E6CE92.8080000@sun.com>
	 <510143ac0709162313m35cfb92aj59c6b56cfc48c2cb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46F1FD03.8090806@sun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:17:21 +0200
Message-Id: <1190269041.9318.243.camel@bslm-046.corp.day.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi all,

Given the growth of the number of more or less independent "top-level
sub-projects" in Jackrabbit, we should probably start again thinking of
having independent releases ?

For example, I could imagine, that OCM has definitely a different
release cycle than core which in turn might have a different cycle than
webdav.

Regards
Felix

Am Donnerstag, den 20.09.2007, 10:24 +0530 schrieb ruchi goel:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 9/11/07, ruchi goel <Ruchi.Goel@sun.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> What is the expected time frame for release of Jackrabbit 1.4 ?
> >>     
> >
> > I don't yet have any exact dates, but I'd expect at least a month or
> > two before the release is ready. At least we still need to finalize
> > the data store implementation and handle the upgrades of the OCM and
> > SPI components. I'll come up with a more detailed release plan with
> > relevant Jira references in near future.
> >
> > Is there interest in getting some essential bug fixes out already
> > before the 1.4 release? I could easily imagine doing a 1.3.2 patch
> > release if there's interest.
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Jukka Zitting
> >   
> Yes, we are deeply interested in an interim release since we were 
> dependent on Graffito's OCM layer earlier. Now since it is part of 
> Jackrabbit , we will be depending on a Jackrabbit release   to be 
> bundled in our product.
> 
> Is 1.4 release on hold because of the bugs  mentioned in the mail chain 
> ( with the same subject).
> 
> Thanks,
> Ruchi