Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fmeschbe@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=as+nO93qzMJl4uISELADm7vRh6ZVcR546vvp6+WKT16k+oR5Tka/BImMNDY7nkJxB5uccG7LDEL9CsesTxXuwhJea69Vj2tGT3unXZs6szgdkBeA+Y/r6fdmSPRN35m5n66mAohYC+ZB7jpVI2DYS+y9L/r1TW2hXcWC1/B96/A=
Subject: Re: [OCM] SimpleFieldHelper emits alot of WARN messages
From: Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@gmail.com>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <3b728ee90709112321q7257dcc9n466403916e30e487@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1189521905.24859.34.camel@bslm-046.corp.day.com>
	 <3b728ee90709111332xaeb61c7x312b7bf6d17d9abb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1189576806.24859.50.camel@bslm-046.corp.day.com>
	 <3b728ee90709112321q7257dcc9n466403916e30e487@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:28:26 +0200
Message-Id: <1189578506.24859.52.camel@bslm-046.corp.day.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

ok.

Regards
Felix

Am Mittwoch, den 12.09.2007, 08:21 +0200 schrieb Christophe Lombart:
> You can apply the patch and after I will start the refactoting.
> 
> Thanks,
> Christophe
> 
> 
> On 9/12/07, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Alright then, I will create the JIRA and try to setup a patch.
> >
> > Christophe, as you are currently refactoring the code, shall I just
> > apply the patch or do you want to integrate this in your refactoring
> > work ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Felix
> >
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 22:32 +0200 schrieb Christophe Lombart:
> > > On 9/11/07, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > The SimpleFieldsHelper.retrieveSimpleField method is used to load JCR
> > > > properties into "simple" fields. If a node does not have a mapped
> > > > property, a warning message is emited. I am not sure, whether it is
> > > > actually a problematic situation if a property, which is not mandatory
> > > > does not exist ? In fact, if a property is mandatory, it may or may
> > not
> > > > exist and thus the mapping may be supplied or not.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think of lowering the severity of this situation to debug
> > ?
> > > > Alternatively (or in addition) the descriptor might be extended such
> > > > that the mapping may declared as mandatory without rquiring the
> > property
> > > > to be mandatory or there might even be some default value specified or
> > > > the SimpleFieldsHelper might access the property definition to see
> > > > whether there is a default value defined ....
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +2  (+1 for the debug, +1 for the  changing a little bit the code and/or
> > > the descriptor).
> >
> >