From dev-return-14144-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Fri Sep 14 08:05:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24766 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2007 08:05:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2007 08:05:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 14149 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2007 08:05:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 14120 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2007 08:05:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 14109 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2007 08:05:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:05:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:07:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 24712 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2007 08:05:22 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO carsten-ziegelers-computer.local) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2007 08:05:22 -0000 Message-ID: <46EA40BF.9090105@apache.org> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:05:19 +0200 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: ocm - new project structure References: <3b728ee90709131404i66b0283aw897d845ed242f882@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bertrand Delacretaz schrieb: > On 9/13/07, Christophe Lombart wrote: > >> ...I never made this kind of stuff with svn (reorg full folder tree...) . So, >> I'm just wondering if there are some points to review before doing ... > > As long as you tag the source tree before starting, the risk is zero. > > Like Jukka, I prefer the old trusted command line for such extensive svn work. > Though one could think that todays IDEs can handle all of this properly, at least my Eclipse 3.3 with subclipse freaked out the last times when I refactored the code. It did not only change the stuff I wanted to change, but althoug absolutely unrelated code and broke nearly all imports. So if you have a setup like this, I guess command line is much more sane. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziegeler@apache.org