jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jukka Zitting" <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: System slowdown
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:13:33 GMT
Hi,

On 9/20/07, KÖLL Claus <C.KOELL@tirol.gv.at> wrote:
> so my opinion is it should be regardless which peristence manager you use
> jackrabbit should be always transactional if a operation runs inside a transaction
> context. is this true or not ?

You need to have a persistence manager that can store the transaction
changelog as a single atomic operation, which as of now means the
database persistence managers. An underlying database transaction is
still needed for that atomic change, but it's not a part of the
externally managed transaction context.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Mime
View raw message