Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99333 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2007 09:02:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2007 09:02:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 63717 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2007 09:01:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 63682 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2007 09:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 63670 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2007 09:01:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:01:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael.wechner@wyona.com designates 195.226.6.75 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.226.6.75] (HELO mail.wyona.com) (195.226.6.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:01:52 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.53] (unknown [195.226.6.66]) by mail.wyona.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD91F325E09 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:58:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46CAA9CF.20301@wyona.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:01:03 +0200 From: Michael Wechner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920 X-Accept-Language: en, de, en-us, fr-ch MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Jackrabbit, the database References: <5f211bd50708200054r6d580acajef0756a99e2143e1@mail.gmail.com> <1b0d43d00708210042o3d35421bl922dd95efb419641@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1b0d43d00708210042o3d35421bl922dd95efb419641@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org David Nuescheler wrote: >hi all, > >i can appreciate both positions, looking at jackrabbit as the datastore >or looking at jackrabbit as running on top of a datastore (rdbms). > >personally, i don't believe that the latter perception will go away for >quite a while, so i think jackrabbit should support both views. > >in my experience, i have seen really three different >views so far: > >A: i want to store the entire repository in a relational >database. this allows me to use hot backup and clustering >of the database. > >B: i want to store all the "meta information" in the database >but i also have those really large blobs (movies) that i don't >trust the database with. > >C: i want it to be fast & reliable and easy to deploy >and run in production. > >(does someone on the list not fall into these three options?) > > well, I want my local filesystem accessible via JCR and allowing me to change files still with "vi(m)" from time to time. Or do you consider that covered by A, B or C? But I guess my usecase is probably neglectable as a usecase ... > >.ps: of course i have a personal preference but i think my preference >is well-known ;) > > I don't ;-) what is your personal preference? Cheers Michael -- Michael Wechner Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Yanel, Yulup http://www.wyona.com michael.wechner@wyona.com, michi@apache.org +41 44 272 91 61