Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <1b0d43d00708210220h3c4aa1b2of10339f3b097e3f9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:20:00 +0200
From: "David Nuescheler" <david@day.com>
Sender: uncled@day.com
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit, the database
In-Reply-To: <46CAA9CF.20301@wyona.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <A955EA1F8FE31749AEC8C998082F6C7C01ECDBA4@hai01.hippo.local>
	 <5f211bd50708200054r6d580acajef0756a99e2143e1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1b0d43d00708210042o3d35421bl922dd95efb419641@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46CAA9CF.20301@wyona.com>

Hi Michi,

> well, I want my local filesystem accessible via JCR and allowing me to
> change files still with "vi(m)" from time to time.
> Or do you consider that covered by A, B or C? But I guess my usecase is
> probably neglectable as a usecase ...
I usually use a webdav or an smb mount to be able to use
vi directly on the repository instead of underneith it.
Works very nicely with macosx.

> >.ps: of course i have a personal preference but i think my preference
> >is well-known ;)
> I don't ;-) what is your personal preference?
I am not attached to the rdbms, if it brings no functionality from a content
repository api user or maintenance perspective.
So my personal preference is (C).
I want my repository to be simple, fast, reliable and easy to deploy &
maintain,
but as I mentioned, I can see how others who have a much more db-oriented
background feel differently.

regards,
david