jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christoph Kiehl <christ...@sulu3000.de>
Subject Re: JCR 2.0 extensions
Date Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:09:13 GMT
Julian Reschke wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> On 8/8/07, Christoph Kiehl <christoph@sulu3000.de> wrote:
>>> Sounds good. We just need to make sure that those jsr283 interfaces 
>>> do not
>>> interfere with jsr170 interfaces because some Jackrabbit classes will 
>>> need to
>>> implement both interfaces. But since jsr283 should be mainly backwards
>>> compatible this shouldn't be a problem.
>> Yep. In case we do ran up with compatibility issues, I think we have a
>> good case to request a change in JSR 283.
> As far as I recall, we have at least one method signature that changed 
> with respect to throwing exceptions...

May be can we skip that method as long as possible if it's going to be a problem.

>>> Or do you want to start a whole new branch where all jsr170 interfaces
>>> are replaced by jsr283 interfaces?
>> We need to do that eventually, but I'd very much like to push the
>> branch point as far ahead as possible to avoid getting stuck with two
>> parallel actively developed codebases. Ideally we'd release 1.4 and
>> perhaps even 1.5 with early JCR 2.0 features included before dropping
>> JCR 1.0 from svn trunk and focusing on the real JCR 2.0 interfaces for
>> the Jackrabbit 2.0 release.
> +1

I completely agree. I was in no means in favor of creating a branch as long as 
it could be avoided.


View raw message