jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ard Schrijvers" <a.schrijv...@hippo.nl>
Subject RE: Jackrabbit, the database
Date Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:25:09 GMT

> Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Improvements in the way an underlying database is used are of course
> welcome, but in the big picture I don't like having the database being
> a driving factor in Jackrabbit design. The way I see it we should be
> moving further away from relational databases, towards a native
> hierarchical storage model.
> 
> I don't want Jackrabbit using a database, I want Jackrabbit *being*
> the database!

Jukka, as a programmer I totally agree with you...but, I am very sure, management won't. Obviously,
it are political reasons. Potential (large) customers aren't departing from there oracle infra
structure and firing some oracle specialists because they are moving to Jackrabbit. No, they
won't move to Jackrabbit *if* Jackrabbit cannot store it in oracle. I do not know the ins
and outs obviously, since I am not a salesman (and I do not want be one :-) ), but I am pretty
confindent that moving away from databases would imply loosing big potential customers (and
companies interested in developing Jackrabbit). So, as a programmer I love your idea, but
in the end, it would only harm Jackrabbit a lot AFAICS.

Regards Ard 

> 
> BR,
> 
> Jukka Zitting
> 

Mime
View raw message