jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefan Guggisberg (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-1050) Remove synchronization from JNDI data sources
Date Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:05:30 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520257
] 

Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-1050:
----------------------------------------

discussion on the dev list:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Thomas Mueller <thomas.tom.mueller@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 2, 2007 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (JCR-1050) Remove synchronization from JNDI data sources
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org


Hi,

I'm not sure if I understand this request for improvement.

> Using datasources

So you suggest to use DataSource.getConnection(..) instead of
DriverManager.getConnection(..)? How do you get / create the
datasource object, using JNDI? What about embedded applications where
JNDI is not available?

> one should be able to rely on the application server to manage PreparedStatement caches

Do you suggest to create a new PreparedStatement for each request?

> therefore pre-creating and holding onto the connection for long periods of time should
not be needed.

Could you explain the advantages of 'not holding onto the connection'?
I know that MySQL closes connections after 8 hours idle time, are
there any other advantages?

> This relates to improvement JCR-313, however, that change did not address the benefits
one could see in using an application server controlled datasource.

What are those benefits?

> Even if jackrabbit does aim to use an embedded database such a system could be configured
to use datasources and

> could benefit from the removal of the synchronization.

In what way would removal of the synchronization be a benefit? Do you
think it would be faster without synchronization? How would you make
sure statements are executed in the right order?

Thanks,
Thomas

> Remove synchronization from JNDI data sources
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1050
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1050
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Padraic Hannon
>         Attachments: JNDI_Datasource_Changes.diff
>
>
> Using datasources one should be able to rely on the application server to manage PreparedStatement
caches therefore pre-creating and holding onto the connection for long periods of time should
not be needed. This relates to improvement JCR-313, however, that change did not address the
benefits one could see in using an application server controlled datasource. Even if jackrabbit
does aim to use an embedded database such a system could be configured to use datasources
and could benefit from the removal of the synchronization. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message