jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefan Guggisberg" <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit, the database
Date Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:57:36 GMT
On 8/18/07, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Late night ramblings...
>
> There's recently been a lot of talk about managing the database
> connections (and transactions) of the Jackrabbit persistence managers.
> It was even suggested that Jackrabbit be refactored so that each
> session would map to a separate database connection.
>
> Improvements in the way an underlying database is used are of course
> welcome, but in the big picture I don't like having the database being
> a driving factor in Jackrabbit design. The way I see it we should be
> moving further away from relational databases, towards a native
> hierarchical storage model.
>
> I don't want Jackrabbit using a database, I want Jackrabbit *being*
> the database!

i couldn't agree more...

cheers
stefan

>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

Mime
View raw message