jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefan Guggisberg" <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Nodetype reregistration and JackrabbitNodeTypeManager
Date Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:48:34 GMT
On 8/13/07, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 13.08.2007, 10:31 +0200 schrieb Christoph Kiehl:
> > What do you think of option two in my original mail, regardless of when the new
> > nodetype management API is available?
>
> Honestly, while I agree to not grow the API, I favor the first option,
> as modifying the implementation to re-register node types would change
> the API (contract) - and this I dislike even more than growing the
> API...

-1 for option 2.

i agree with felix. after all there's a clear distinction between registering a
new type vs modifying an existing type, like e.g. in sql dml: 'create table'
vs 'alter table'.

cheers
stefan

>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>

Mime
View raw message