jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ard Schrijvers (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-1064) Optimize queries that check for the existence of a property
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:43:31 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523205

Ard Schrijvers commented on JCR-1064:

> Ah, I see. That's where the misunderstanding is. Unless otherwise indicated (by static
analysis of the query tree, see JCR-1066) a query is 
> executed on both indexes using a MultiReader. This means the query is only executed once
and across both indexes. 

Now I am convinced and understand your concerns! :-)

I'll create a new patch with JCR-1093 taken into account, and a default value for indexFormatVersion

> Optimize queries that check for the existence of a property
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-1064
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1064
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: indexing
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.1
>            Reporter: Ard Schrijvers
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.4
>         Attachments: JCR-1064-2.patch, JCR-1064-2.patch, JCR-1064-2.patch, JCR-1064-DEPR.patch
> //*[@mytext] is transformed into the org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.MatchAllQuery,
that through the MatchAllWeight uses the MatchAllScorer.  The calculateDocFilter() in MatchAllScorer
 does not scale and becomes slow for growing number of nodes. 
> Solution: lucene documents will get a new Field:
> public static final String PROPERTIES_SET = "_:PROPERTIES_SET".intern();
> that holds the available properties of this document. 
> NOTE: Lucene indices build without this performance improvement should still work and
fall back to the original implementation

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message