Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29774 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2007 13:37:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2007 13:37:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 6884 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 13:37:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 6557 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 13:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 6548 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2007 13:37:28 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:37:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:37:25 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B5D71418E for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 06:37:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1366402.1183988224933.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 06:37:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (JCR-1004) SPI: Add RepositoryService.getQNodeTypeDefinition In-Reply-To: <12731052.1183622285037.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511119 ] Julian Reschke commented on JCR-1004: ------------------------------------- While doing this, should we rename getNodeTypeDefinitions() to getQNodeTypeDefinitions() ? I would think so... > SPI: Add RepositoryService.getQNodeTypeDefinition > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JCR-1004 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1004 > Project: Jackrabbit > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: SPI > Reporter: angela > Assignee: Julian Reschke > > Finding of the F2F (2/3 July) > similar to recent modifications to the retrieval of name spaces the node type management should be changed in order to only retrieve the complete set of node types on demand. Otherwise single node type definitions should be retrieved as required. > To achieve this we agreed to add RepositoryService.getQNodeTypeDefinition -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.