jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Felix Meschberger" <Felix.Meschber...@day.com>
Subject Re: Object Content Mapping - Status
Date Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:38:21 GMT
Hi,

Thanks for adding this to continuum.

Re Release: If adding OCM to the 1.4 release, would it be possible to have
an initial "standalone" release after 1.3.1 but before Jackrabbit 1.4 ? I
have no actual requirement currently, just being curious.

Regard
Felix

On 6/20/07, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 6/20/07, Christophe Lombart <christophe.lombart@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6/20/07, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Do you want to make a standalone OCM release,
> > > or should we include it as a component in the Jackrabbit 1.4 release?
> >
> > It should nice to see it as a component of Jackrabbit 1.4. I think more
> > developpers will use it if it is an "official" Jackrabbit component.
>
> Agreed. I'd love to see OCM going out in Jackrabbit 1.4, which really
> seems to be shaping up as an excellent release with all the recent
> activity.
>
> > Why not for Jackrabbit 1.3.1 (depending on the release date) ?
>
> 1.3.1 is planned to go out in two weeks so the schedule is really
> tight. Our policy has also been to avoid introducing new features in
> patch releases, so I would rather go for 1.4.
>
> My current thinking is to have 1.4 going out sometime in
> September/October, which actually is pretty close already given that
> activity is likely to drop a bit during the next two months due to
> summer vacations.
>
> > > It would be nice to have OCM included in our Continuum installation at
> > > http://jackrabbit.zones.apache.org/. Do you mind if I do the required
> > > POM updates (mostly <scm/> entries)?
> >
> > Excellent idea.
>
> I'll go for it.
>
> > Another point :
> > Do you have some recommandation for the website doc ? I would like to
> > migrate the old ocm into the Jackrabbit website.
>
> The Jackrabbit website is really quite a mess and I've been meaning to
> do something about that for a long while. I've created a set of
> component documentation pages under doc/components, it would probably
> be best to start putting OCM documentation in there for now.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message