jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thomas Mueller" <thomas.tom.muel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Next Generation Persistence
Date Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:23:01 GMT
Hi,

Thanks for the link!

And after a crash, you can re-index everything, then things are
consistent and no data is lost (only time is lost). So solving the
transactional problem of the index is not highest priority. Still it
would be nice to have a clean solution.

Thomas


On 6/15/07, Marcel Reutegger <marcel.reutegger@day.com> wrote:
> Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I didn't find an open issue for: The search index is updated outside
> > of transactions. This doesn't feel right (I like consistency), but in
> > practice this is not a problem as long as all saved objects are in the
> > index: the query engine filters non-existing results. Is this correct?
>
> yes, this is correct.
>
> there is a jira issue that mentions this problem:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-204
>
> regards
>   marcel
>

Mime
View raw message