jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-18) Multithreading issue with versioning
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:01:42 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-18?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12508093

Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-18:

Added a test case for this issue:


At revision: 550724

> Multithreading issue with versioning
> ------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-18
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-18
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: versioning
>    Affects Versions: 0.9, 1.0
>         Environment: Jackrabbit SVN Rev. 56918
>            Reporter: Felix Meschberger
>            Assignee: Tobias Bocanegra
> In a multithreading environment with two or more threads accessing the same version history,
inconsistent state may be encountered. Concretely, the first thread is currently checking
in the node to which the version history is attached while the second thread walks this same
version history by means of a "self-built" iterator, which just accesses the successors of
each version to get the "next" to visit.
> At a certain point the second point may encounter an ItemNotFoundException with a stack
trace similar to this:
> javax.jcr.ItemNotFoundException: c9bd405b-dff4-46ef-845c-d98e073e473a
>         at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.ItemManager.createItemInstance(ItemManager.java:354)
>         at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.ItemManager.getItem(ItemManager.java:230)
>         at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.SessionImpl.getNodeByUUID(SessionImpl.java:494)
>         at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.version.VersionImpl.getSuccessors(VersionImpl.java:86)
>         ....
> It seems that the first thread has already filled the successor of the version, while
the node is not yet accessible by the createItemInstance method.
> This bug seems to not be enforcible, but it is easily reproducible.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message