From dev-return-12052-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Mon May 21 19:16:55 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45584 invoked from network); 21 May 2007 19:16:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 May 2007 19:16:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 45928 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2007 19:17:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 45612 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2007 19:16:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 45603 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2007 19:16:59 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of christophe.lombart@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.243 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.243] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:51 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c37so432660anc for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Gg4inr+xNYVgQqnujwtScj02TEUYCBuTe6uKwC1X5OLlzK3tW8G6E8ol3RiujCsbKygfGLUE3MxbZ9I4qilThtpprkkudaqDjE2boSbaUD20M/Uj2rM7ykp+tnS9rddVU5dgFSb3Yap3b1of51P3y5d9CT9VlFPJ+1nEXSWSs10= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=urPxSYgiwJN0ZUs2LKe5R9poLB254qVNXEh+VaMtTtYT8/uu793Oe3pCKpsqXyQXMYwefWhv4NgSfp88lJFZi1ml45gyC6WMNYJH7Anuy5BxiVRvE4AQoKNTnzNuN0xgEDXKmrJGn6OdUNP0/acx8oCvDIzrzT+gP4YufrQWj3k= Received: by 10.100.201.11 with SMTP id y11mr3242439anf.1179774990389; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.126.3 with HTTP; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3b728ee90705211216x1583c020o608a1a7dbf7eaf2a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:16:30 +0200 From: "Christophe Lombart" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: session.move vs. workspace.move MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_80655_17070759.1179774990313" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_80655_17070759.1179774990313 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, In the ocm framework, we have the feature to move object. When the implementation uses the jcr call 'session.move (src, dst)', it works fine. the source node is deleted but if the implementation used the jcr call ' workspace.move(src, dst)', the source node is not deleted. I'm wondering why the both methods are not providing the same result. Is it not a bug or do I miss something ? br, Christophe ------=_Part_80655_17070759.1179774990313--